Web www.theriverman.blogspot.com

Friday, February 08, 2008

A Truly Biblical Re-Wording Of The So-called “Defense Of Marriage Act”

To any Christian Conservitive Right-Wing Republican whom it may concern:

I have found the Defense Of Marriage Act quite incomplete in supporting true Biblical marriage. Therefore, as I would like to help you all to define marriage in the most Biblically proper way the Defense of Biblical Marriage Act ( previously known as the Defense Of Marriage Act), I propose that it shall hereafter read as follows:

Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one or more women (Gen. 29:17-28; II Sam. 3:2-5).

Marriage must not impede a man's right to take concubines in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam. 5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron. 11:21)

In order to be considered valid, a marriage the bride must be a virgin. If she is not a virgin, she must be executed. (Deut. 22:13-21)

Marriage of a believer and a non-believer is unlawful and will be prohibited. . (Gen. 24:3; Num. 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh. 10:30)

Given that Biblical marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be construed to permit divorce. (Deut. 22:19; Mark 10:9)

When a married man dies without children, his brother must marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother's widow or deliberately does not give her children, he must pay a fine of one shoe and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (Gen. 38:6-10; Deut. 25:5-10)

And there you have it. I’m just trying to do my part for all the CCRwR’s out there…
…you’re welcome.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com Is my Blog HOT or NOT?